On June 15, 2011, the Seoul Central District Court 2010Kadan195366, dated June 15, 201, against the defendants (appointed parties) and the designated parties.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On April 30, 208, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the Appointor (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) acquired ownership of the building of this case and the land of this case, which had been owned by G (the building of this case is divided into five floors of reinforced concrete structure (the first floor, second floor, fourth floor, and fourth floor, and the building of this case) and H (the third floor is divided into three floors, but the transfer registration was completed with respect to the share of 489.04/616.79), and H (the third floor was divided into three floors, but the transfer registration was completed with respect to the share of 127.75) and G, and the lessee filed a lawsuit of this case to remove the building of this case and the claim for return of unjust enrichment on the ground (the Seoul Central District Court 20106.16.65) and the lessee filed a lawsuit against the Defendant, the heir of this case, who had completed the provisional disposition registration based on the right to claim the transfer registration, and the lessee of this case and the Defendants 151 and the heir of this case were 15.61.6

(이하 ‘이 사건 강제조정결정’이라 한다). ◎ 원고 등이 G에게 2억 원을 지급함과 동시에, G는 이 사건 건물 중 그 소유 지분을 원고 등에게 이전하고, 제지하1층 및 제1층에서 퇴거하며, 기 설정된 가압류를 해제시키고, M의 강제경매개시신청을 취하시키며, J, K는 제4층 및 옥탑에서 퇴거함. ◎ 원고 등이 피고들에게 1억 원을 지급함과 동시에, 피고들은 이 사건 건물에 관한 가처분을 해제시키고, L은 제2층에서 퇴거함. ◎ 원고 등이 H에게 1억 2,000만 원을 지급함과 동시에, H은 이 사건 건물 중 그 소유 지분을 원고 등에게 이전하고, 제3층에서 퇴거하며, 기 설정된 가처분 및 압류를 해제시킴. 나.

However, G applies for compulsory auction of M. M.