The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant asserts that he was absent without permission from the workplace for the treatment of depression, and the defendant actually was absent from the workplace due to the absence of official duties and reflects his wrong. However, such circumstances are deemed to have been sufficiently taken into account in the original judgment, and there is no special change in circumstances to change the sentence of the original judgment, the defendant is subject to the same repeated offense, and all other sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character, conduct, environment, and circumstances after the crime. The defendant's argument is without merit, and the defendant's punishment imposed by the lower court is not unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is groundless.