1. The Daejeon District Court drawn up on May 20, 2015, with respect to the case of the voluntary auction of real estate E with Hongsung Branch District Court.

1. In the auction procedure indicated in the order of H factory site No. 4,769 square meters and each building on the land owned by Bocheon-si Co., Ltd. F (former trade name: G; hereinafter “instant company”), the Defendants filed a report on rights and demand for distribution with the executing court by asserting that they are wage creditors against the instant company.

On May 20, 2015, the court of execution prepared and presented a distribution schedule to the Plaintiff, the takeover of the Industrial Bank of Korea (which is the applicant creditor and the mortgagee-mortgage), 201,47,237 won, 2,090,437 won to the Defendant A, 1,615,390 won to the Defendant B, 443,000 won to the Defendant C, and 870,000 won to the Defendant D (hereinafter “instant distribution schedule”), and the Plaintiff stated an objection against the total dividends to the Defendants.

On the other hand, on October 29, 2015, the Plaintiff and the original Defendants of the instant case were to withdraw each lawsuit against Defendant I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R (hereinafter “I, etc.”), and the Defendants agreed to the withdrawal of the lawsuit. 2. Of the distribution schedule prepared by the Daejeon District Court on May 20, 2015, the amount of KRW 140,000 against Defendant P, the amount of KRW 50,000 against Defendant P, the amount of KRW 243,000 against Defendant Q, the amount of dividends against the Plaintiff, KRW 201,47,237,279,201, and the settlement recommendation as KRW 201,737,209 against the Plaintiff, respectively.

As the Plaintiff and I did not object to the above decision of recommending reconciliation, the amount of dividend between the Plaintiff and I became final and conclusive as above.

[Reasons for Recognition]

(a) Defendant A, B: Fact that there is no dispute, Party A, 1 through 8 (including each number if there is a virtual number; hereinafter the same shall apply), and the purport of the whole pleadings;

(b) Defendant C or D: Confession;

2. The Defendants, which caused the Plaintiff’s claim, constitute the most wage obligee, to delete the amount of dividends against the Defendants.