Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the business of driving electrical bicycles.
On November 1, 2019, at around 19:05, the Defendant driven the above electrical bicycle and proceeded with the bicycle road 1704, from the right side of the steel 1st century, on the e-mail.
At night and at night, street lamps were not installed, and thus, it was difficult to keep the surrounding areas. Therefore, the driver had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering system, and by accurately operating the steering system.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and got the front side of the bridge of the victim B (ma, 67 years old) in the same direction as that of the defendant's electrical bicycle.
Ultimately, by occupational negligence, the Defendant suffered from an injury to the victim, such as blood transfusion under the external wound, which had no open head in the treatment days, thereby causing confusion, communication and impossibility of daily life, etc., leading to the occurrence of an incurable or incurable disease.
2. The board shall not be prosecuted against the express will expressed by the victim;
(Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. However, the victim withdraws his wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted.
Therefore, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.