logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.04.06 2016나2036896
소유권이전등기말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance and alteration of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since the reasons for the acceptance and alteration are as follows, except for dismissal or addition:

The 7th page "the defendant is the defendant" in the 7th page.

The 7th page 10 " has been received," from 11 to 11 shall be "undertake."

Part 7: The following shall be added to Chapter 12:

If the plaintiff's assertion is the case, the part which is divided into the defendant's ownership in the division agreement in this case is the title trust to the defendant on the co-inheritors, and the part which is divided into D is the actual share of inheritance, which is contrary to the contents of evidence No. 1 (consultation) and it is difficult to accept as it is because it is interpreted differently from the part of the defendant's ownership and the part which is owned by D.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim of this case must be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow