logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2017.04.18 2016고단943
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 10, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) and the Road Traffic Act (hereinafter referred to as the “Aggravated Punishment, etc.”) led the Defendant to drive a B-hand car with a alcohol concentration of 0.169% under the influence of alcohol during blood on November 10, 2016, along the two-lanes of the road in front of D in C in C in C in C in C in C in C in C in C in C in C in C in C in the direction of training.

At the time, since it was difficult to see at night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving safely, such as reducing speed and accurately operating the steering direction and brake system, by safe driving of a driver engaged in driving of a motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected such duty of care, while driving under the influence of alcohol on the road, caused the Defendant to take the back part of the FK5 si's right side side side of the FK5 si driving under the influence of the victim E (56 Do) (56 Do) who was driving in one lane in the direction of the course, and caused the said si to have the said si on the right side side of the road.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim E and the victim G (32) on board the said taxi due to the foregoing occupational negligence, respectively, for approximately two weeks of medical treatment. At the same time, the Defendant did not take necessary measures, such as destroying the said taxi to the extent that the repair cost, such as exchange of back panions, was 5,383,904 won and providing relief to victims.

2. The Defendant, in violation of the Road Traffic Act, driven a vehicle B with alcohol concentration of approximately 0.169% in a section of about 1km from the front of the drinking house, “I” located in H at the time of the day specified in paragraph 1 to the road near the fest road located in the same Sig-dong via the places specified in paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1.With respect to E and G:

arrow