logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2015.06.24 2015고합25
준강간
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete 100 hours of sexual assault treatment program.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 3, 2014, under the influence of alcohol on December 23:10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) had weak ability to discern things or make decisions; (b) had an insular singing room, which is a company partner C (n, 25 years of age) with the victim C, etc., and had an insular singing room, completed a meeting with the victim C, etc., and, (c) had an insular talked with the victim, who is unable to properly hold his/her body properly; and (d) had sexual intercourse with the victim while he/she was born in a taxi; (b) had the victim had an insular telecom 402; and (c) had sexual intercourse with the victim by taking advantage of the victim’s mental disorder condition.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each statement made by the witness C and F in this Court;

1. Each statement made by the police officer C concerning each statement;

1. Each description of a complaint filed in C and a written statement;

1. Each investigation report on police preparation (including attachment CDs and photographs attached thereto). Each investigation report on police preparation (in relation to the discovery of CCTVs and CCTVs, investigation related to the attachment of photographs / G telephone conversations for a witness / G telephone for a witness / J telephone for a witness / K telephone for a witness / K telephone for a witness / F telephone for a witness / a witness) is recorded or video (including attachment of a criminal investigation report with accompanying CDs or photographs);

1. Each recording note of the preparation of L by a stenography (F on December 5, 2014 and the Defendant’s telephone conversations / On December 4, 2014)

1. Determination as to each video defendant and defense counsel's assertion on each video of each cell phone screen (Evidence No. 106-111 of the evidence records)

1. The summary of the argument is that the defendant, together with the victim, only when he enters the above telecom, memory is unsatisfy, and thereafter, he did not have a sexual relationship with the victim, and even if he had a family sexual relationship, it was done under the agreement with the victim.

2. Determination:

A. (i) The following facts are acknowledged according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, as to whether the victim had sexual intercourse with the victim.

㈎ 피고인은 2014. 12. 4. 피해자의 어머니인...

arrow