logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2019.01.29 2018고단1197
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for a year and six months, Defendant B’s imprisonment for a year, Defendant C’s fine of KRW 6,00,000, and Defendant D.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[Criminal Power] On March 24, 2016, Defendant A sentenced Defendant A to eight months of imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act at the Changwon District Court, etc., and completed the execution of the sentence on May 14, 2016.

【Criminal Facts】

No one shall provide game products for distribution or use, the contents of which are different from those classified by the Game Products Management Committee, or display or keep the same for such purposes.

On the other hand, no person shall engage in the business of exchanging or arranging exchange or repurchase tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products.

The Defendants: (a) Defendant A had much experience in operating the illegal game site; (b) the role of managing the overall operation of the game site; (c) the role of Defendant B in raising funds for the installation and operation of the illegal game site in each type of the above A; and (d) Defendant C and Defendant D conspired in order to play a role of a person in charge of the site of the illegal game site as the friendship of the above A.

1. The operation of “F” in E from April 23, 2018 to July 24, 2018

A. From April 23, 2018 to July 16:30, 2018, Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C provided “F” as classified by the Game Industry Management Committee from April 23, 2018 to July 24, 2018, with five PC units installed so as to allow customers to use the “defaat,” “defaat,” “defaat,” and “baat,” which are different from the rated contents, and provided a ID (H-I, 9) and password created in advance to unspecified customers visiting the PC by having the manager G different from the rated contents, and operated the business by directly charging KRW 10,000 game money per 10,000 in cash.

As a result, Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C provided game products with contents different from the classified contents in collusion.

arrow