A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) at the inn of the Suwon Friju on January 21, 2008, and on April 5, 2012, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million with the same offense, etc. at the same court on April 5, 2012, and was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million.

[Criminal facts]

1. On January 1, 2016, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol content of 0.108% in blood at around 00:10, the Defendant driven a sports-based car at approximately 600 meters away from the front of the niver of the niver of the g of Echeon-si to the front of the niver of the niver of the niver of the niver of Echeon-si to the front of the niver of the niver of Echeon-si.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a sports car even in B coaches.

On January 1, 2016, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol content of 00:10% in blood, was driving at the speed of 0.108% in 0.10% in e.g., the two lanes ahead of the shooting distance in the e.g., e., e., the e., the e., the e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e.

At the time, there is an intersection with signal lights at the front of the defendant's moving direction, so in such a case, the driver had a duty of care to live well in the front door and safely drive the accident to prevent the accident from spreading.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty at the front time while driving the signal stop on the Defendant’s front bank by negligence (hereinafter “victim C”) who was under the influence of driving the signal stop at the Defendant’s front bank (hereinafter “VF La”) and was driven by the Defendant on the back of the New EF rocketing, which was driven by the Defendant on the front line of the sports vehicle. As a result, the Defendant got the victim D(73) who was under the atmosphere while driving the said rocketing car, thereby getting the rear part of the Echier XG car.

Ultimately, the defendant needs to provide approximately two weeks medical treatment to the victims due to such occupational negligence.