1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, except for the following 2. Additional Judgment, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance.

2. The defendant asserts that the bill of this case is a financing bill issued without the delivery of discount. However, the issuer of the financing bill cannot set up against the third party who has acquired the bill in good faith or bad faith, or against the defense that it is a financing bill issued without compensation even if it was acquired by endorsement after the time limit (Supreme Court Decision 2001Da28176 Decided August 24, 2001). Even if the financing bill of this case is a financing bill, the defendant cannot set up against the plaintiff as a third party who has acquired the bill of this case, and the above argument by the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.