beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.
Of the facts charged in the instant case, the fraud against the victim B is acquitted.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
From around 2008 to August 2009, the Defendant was a person who had been working in so-called so-called so-called so-called “victim” in collusion with the above-mentioned under the pretext of receiving money, even though the Defendant did not have the qualifications to stay against Korean nationals staying in Australia together with the brosers who assist the Defendant in the work of the Defendant, such as name “C” and “D,” in Australia, but the Defendant could resolve the problem of extending the visa or acquiring the sovereignty.
1. Around April 2008, the criminal defendant against the victim E made a false statement to the victim E and the victim's husband G from F located in the area of the Sinannan City in Australia, stating that "I would allow four family members to receive the citizen's right of Australia within three months from the 100,000 square meters for expenses because there are many persons who want to move to the family."
However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to obtain the family citizen's right normally from the victim's family members within three months.
Around May 9, 2008, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received USD 25,00 (Korean Won 24,576,500) in cash from H located in Australia, which was located in Australia, from the victim, on or around May 9, 2008, and acquired KRW 102,647,315 (" KRW 102,617,315" stated in the indictment, as shown in the annexed crime list, from around that time to February 21, 2013, as shown in the annexed crime list, from the victim to 23 times under the same name, received KRW 102,647,315 (the "102,617,315" stated in the indictment, from the victim in cash or acquired it by
2. The Defendant was not entitled to the Australian citizen rights under the same name as indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1) even though he was promised from May 9, 2008 to July 25, 2008 to receive the total Australia $53,500 from the above G and E.
E shall be from January 2009 to February 2009 by the defendant "Is Is before the end of February 2009."