logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.05.12 2015나12551
채무부존재확인
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. In the first instance court’s trial scope, the part of the Plaintiff’s claim for confirmation of invalidity of an insurance contract against the Defendant is dismissed, and the part of the Defendant’s claim for confirmation of existence of an obligation was wholly cited, and only a part of the Defendant’s counterclaim against the Plaintiff was cited.

Accordingly, since the plaintiff filed an appeal against the part against the plaintiff among the counterclaim claims, only the part of the counterclaim claims shall be subject to the judgment of this court.

2. The court's explanation of this case is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow