logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.06.14 2013고정949
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 17, 2011, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the above court No. 352, 129 Incheon District Court 2010Kadan1907, and testified after being sworn. 352 on October 17, 201, the Defendant appeared as witness of the above court No. 2010Kadan1907.

1. The Defendant testified that C’s defense counsel testified to the Defendant that “A witness has not brought a lawsuit against the Defendant (C) for the amount of KRW 30 million,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won.”

However, on April 2009, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against C to pay the agreed amount of KRW 30 million with the Incheon District Court 2009Da36103.

2. The Defendant testified to the Defendant that “A under a written agreement would not have made a lawsuit against the Defendant (C).”

However, in fact, the defendant submitted to the defendant a written agreement to pay 30 million won agreed upon to the defendant as evidence, and filed a lawsuit against C for the above agreed amount claim.

As above, the Defendant testified with a false testimony against his memory and raised a perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocols of partial police statements concerning C;

1. General details of the case;

1. Written complaint (argument) and each written agreement (No. 252 through 255 pages of investigation records);

1. A written judgment (an investigation record, title 12 through 23);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the protocol of examination of witness in the fifth protocol of the trial in the case No. 2010 high-class 1907 of the Incheon District Court Branch Court;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow