1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion was requested by C to perform repair works for the building located D, E, and F owned by the defendant, Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun (hereinafter "the building in this case") on behalf of the defendant, and completed construction from January 24, 2010 to May 29, 2010. The construction cost is KRW 54,01,200. The plaintiff received KRW 29,500,000 from C and did not receive the remainder of KRW 24,51,200, and thus, the defendant must pay the above money to the plaintiff.

2. According to the purport of the written evidence No. 1 and the entire pleadings, it is recognized that the Defendant, the owner of the instant building, presents tenants of the instant building to C and delegated the repair work of the building to C.

However, with respect to the fact that the Defendant granted C the authority to conclude a contract for construction on behalf of the Defendant, and that C concluded a contract for construction on behalf of the Defendant on behalf of the Defendant, the evidence No. 1 (the inside attorney of the building) does not prove that the sealed seal is the Defendant’s seal, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

In addition, even if an implied contractual relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant exists between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, or even if the Defendant agreed to pay reasonable construction cost to the Plaintiff, it is insufficient to recognize that the Plaintiff’s construction cost as to the instant building exceeds KRW 29,50,000, which the Plaintiff received from C, solely with the descriptions of evidence Nos. 2 through 9 and No. 2, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.