logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.04.23 2014고단840
공정증서원본불실기재등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for six months, each of the defendants E.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 5, 2013, Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months by imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Doing Vehicles) at the Seoul Southern District Court on March 5, 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on March 10, 2013.

Defendant E, “2014 Highest 840, Goyang-si, had been working in the certified judicial scrivener office in order to make it difficult to repay the debts owing to the deficit accumulated, and Defendant E continued personal rehabilitation through Defendant A, who had been working in the certified judicial scrivener office in order to make it difficult to repay the debts. On November 11, 2011, the decision to authorize the individual rehabilitation repayment plan became final and conclusive and the repayment plan was to repay the debts for 60 months.

During that period, Defendant E was incorporated into a housing project zone and received a request for compensation negotiation from the Korea Land and Housing Corporation. In that case, it would be difficult to properly receive compensation due to the claim and obligation related to the existing individual rehabilitation application, so that Defendant E could not be able to avoid this in a way that Defendant A and Defendant A bear false and fraudulent obligations.

On June 25, 2012, at a notary public F office located near the Seoul Eastern District Court located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendants made a statement to the attorney-at-law-at-law in charge of authentication as if Defendant E bears the liability of KRW 50,000 against Defendant A, and made the said attorney-at-law in charge of authentication as to promissory notes, the issue date of which is March 30, 201, where Defendant E, the receiver of which is KRW 50,000,000, and the issue date of which is March 30, 2011.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to make the original of the notarial deed unwritten and exercised the original of the notarial deed which was falsely entered.

The defendant A of "2014 Highest 871" is a person who has been acting for a legal procedure related to a divorce lawsuit by the victim H. Seoul around July 16, 2012.

arrow