Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The following facts are not disputed between the parties, or may be acknowledged in full view of the purport of the entire pleadings in Gap evidence No. 7 and Eul evidence No. 8:
C and D were legal couples who completed the marriage report on August 6, 1958, and had the Plaintiff (son) and the Defendant (son) and E (son). On October 29, 1998, C died after having left D, the Plaintiff, and the Defendant as inheritor on October 29, 1998, and D died after having left the Plaintiff and the Defendant as inheritor on September 22, 2012.
B. On September 16, 2003, the registration of ownership transfer for the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) that was owned by the network C was made on September 16, 2003 by reason of “an inheritance by consultation or division” under the name of the Defendant.
C. On the other hand, around September 2003, around September 2003 between the Plaintiff, Defendant, D, and E, a contract for division of inheritance (Evidence A7) with the content that “the instant apartment, which is the C’s inherited property, belongs to the Defendant and waivers of D, Plaintiff, and E” was drafted.
2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment as to the plaintiff
A. After the death of the Plaintiff’s assertion C, D, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and E agreed on the division of inherited property that the Plaintiff would have the instant real estate on November 1, 1998.
(S) The plaintiff will have KRW 120 million, and the defendant will have KRW 80 million. Since then, around September 2003, the plaintiff entered into a title trust agreement with the defendant on the apartment of this case with respect to the apartment of this case, and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the ground of "the inheritance by agreement division" in the defendant's future with D and Ehee cooperation.
At that time, the plaintiff has fully borne the registration tax, acquisition tax, etc. necessary for the registration of transfer of ownership on the apartment of this case, and the plaintiff directly delegated the registration of transfer of ownership to a certified judicial scrivener.