The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The determination of the Defendant appears to have prevented the instant crime due to the lack of economic circumstances at the time, and the amount of damage suffered by the victims due to the instant crime is difficult to view that there is a large amount of damage suffered by the victims, and the fact that the Defendant divided his mistake and reflected against the Defendant is favorable to the Defendant.

However, even prior to the instant case, the Defendant had many records of having been punished for committing the crime of larceny similar to the instant case, such as theft, etc., and committed the instant crime repeatedly during the period of repeated crime despite having been sentenced to imprisonment on account of the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., even though around 2013, the Defendant had committed the instant crime repeatedly during the period of repeated crime; the Defendant attempted to acquire the stolen credit card products with priority to a small amount of preferential goods, and confirm that it is possible to settle the card, thereby making it difficult to commit such crime in full view of the following: (a) the Defendant attempted to obtain the net amount of money equivalent to 1.60,00 won from the bank; (b) the victims’ damage has not been recovered properly up to the present; and (c) the Defendant’s age, environment, character, and conduct, etc., the

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.