A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 19:00 on October 7, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business, by force, interfered with the victim’s restaurant operation by avoiding disturbance for about one hour, including drinking at the “D” restaurant operated by the victim C, which is operated in Gyeyang-gu, Young-gu, Seoyang-gu, Seoyang-si, and drinking to the surrounding customers.

2. The Defendant expressed her motive to the victim E (ma and 39 years of age) who was a guest with a disturbance during the time and place set forth in paragraph 1, such as the date and time set forth in paragraph 1, and in a place set forth in paragraph 1, and assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s left side with the hand floor and her fingers into consideration.

3. On October 7, 2019, at around 19:50 on October 7, 2019, the Defendant: (a) took a bath to G, the police box of the Goyang Police Station, which was called “Interference with the business by a male guest” upon receiving a report from 112; (b) tried to see the circumstances by stating, “I am going to come to the front of the past, I am going to go to the front of the past, I am going to go to go to the front; and (c) tried to see the said circumstances by avoiding tobacco by a hand and to go to the left hand; (d) the above circumstances were attached to the victim’s left arms; and (e) “I am to the front of the past.”

1. In light of the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation and the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation, this case’s tax evasion and the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation and the principle of mutatis mutandis taxation were applied to this case’s tax evasion and exemption.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. A written statement of C and E;

1. CCTV photographs and video CDs in the D cafeteria;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to details of handling 112 Reporting Cases;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order;