1. The Defendant’s KRW 15,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from March 1, 2017 to August 11, 2017.

1. In principle, a third party who renders a judgment on the cause of a claim by committing an unlawful act with the spouse, thereby infringing on a couple’s communal life falling under the essence of marriage or interfering with the maintenance thereof and infringing on the spouse’s right as the spouse, thereby causing mental pain to the spouse, constitutes a tort. As alleged by the Defendant, the act does not constitute a tort in which the husband and wife’s separate life or divorce is established by such unlawful act.

Therefore, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, the plaintiff and C have completed the marriage report on October 15, 1997; C has developed from 2006 to the domestic relationship after becoming aware of the defendant who was attending the same company in 2003; and continued the above relationship for 2010 or 2016 after beginning the sexual relationship; although the plaintiff and C have clearly known that he had internal relations between C and the defendant around 2013, the plaintiff did not have a divorce by opposing his children, and C does not have a divorce; however, after that time, the plaintiff continued to have become aware of these circumstances on January 1, 2016, the plaintiff and the defendant continued to have a marital relationship with C 200 and C 16, and the defendant continued to have a marital relationship with C 160,000,0000, 30,0000 and C 16,000,000.