logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.11.07 2016가단331391
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a person residing in the Busan Geum-gu Housing (hereinafter "the housing of this case"), and the defendant is a representative of the "D" company that produces and supplies the electricity temperature control season, etc.

On June 2013, the Plaintiff purchased electric temperature control equipment (product name: E; hereinafter “instant electric temperature control equipment”) manufactured by the Defendant and used it in the instant house after installing it.

On the wall side of the lower part of the instant house, the electric temperature control apparatus was installed. However, around April 8, 2015, a fire occurred in the lower part of the instant house at around 02:00, and accordingly, the fire was destroyed by a fire in the lower part of the instant house.

(hereinafter “instant fire” (hereinafter “instant fire”) . [Attachment 2] without dispute, Gap evidence 2 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 1 and 2, the assertion of the purport of the whole pleadings, and the plaintiff’s assertion of the judgment as to the instant fire occurred due to the defect in which the Defendant’s electric temperature control system does not function normally.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of KRW 13,780,00,000, in total, incurred by the Plaintiff while residing in a temporary place of residence due to the instant fire, and KRW 38,00,000,000, in total, of KRW 20,000,000, in total, of KRW 71,780,000.

Judgment

The Plaintiff’s claim is premised on the premise that the instant fire occurred due to the defect in the electric temperature control system of this case, and thus, in light of the health stand, Eul’s statements and images as well as evidence Nos. 3 through 7, 11 through 13, 15, and 16, and the fact-finding results and the entire purport of oral argument as to the Korea Industrial Technology Laboratory of this Court and the following facts and circumstances acknowledged, the above facts acknowledged, Gap evidence No. 3, and the Korea Electric Industry Association of this Court.

arrow