1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) On April 10, 2013, the Plaintiff driven B rocketing car (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) on or around 21:20, while driving the two-lanes of the four-lanes in front D in front of C in C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at C at the speed of Silified, the Plaintiff suffered from the part of the E-driving Fone Star Corspex car in front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”) with the front part of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was sent to the left-hand turn from the opposite side of C at the turn of the Silified announcement at the left-hand turn (hereinafter “instant accident”). Accordingly, the Plaintiff suffered from injury, such as the aftermast, the pelle, and the damage of the lale water in front of the Plaintiff’s vehicle.

(2) On July 15, 2014, the Plaintiff was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for 6 months and one year of suspended execution for the criminal facts that the instant accident occurred due to the violation of signal in the Suwon District Court Decision 2014No464, Jun. 15, 2014, and was sentenced not guilty for the reason that there is no evidence to acknowledge the Plaintiff’s violation of signal in the Suwon District Court Decision 2014No4376, Jul. 17, 2015, and thereafter, the judgment of the appellate court became final and conclusive with the Supreme Court’s dismissal.

(3) The defendant is an insurer who has concluded a comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle.

(4) Meanwhile, the Plaintiff entered into a comprehensive insurance contract with the Defendant’s Intervenor regarding the Plaintiff’s vehicle, and the said comprehensive insurance contract included an automobile accident insurance, and the Defendant’s Intervenor paid KRW 97,166,280 to the Plaintiff KRW 97,16,280 as the automobile accident insurance amount for the Plaintiff’s injury

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2 evidence, Gap 6 through 10 evidence, Eul 1, 3 and 4 evidence, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts, the driver of the Defendant’s vehicle shall proceed with another vehicle that proceeds in accordance with the new subparagraph, even if he/she had been a U-turn in accordance with the new subparagraph.