logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.07.04 2017고단2822
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is a driver of a spati vehicle B.

On November 6, 2017, the Defendant appealed against the collection of the office in front of the “D cafeteria” on the roads of the “D cafeteria” located in the Seogu Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, and that public officials belonging to the E Team held the Defendant’s vehicle in custody on the grounds of the arrears of administrative fines, and that public officials belonging to the E Team held the Defendant’s vehicle in custody on the grounds of the arrears of administrative fines, and that the Defendant’s “s fechis, dead fire, and public officials

"Pest tear festing down," and repeatedly take a bath, and the collection of the audience of the above month and the public officials F of the E team shall be the defendant "Is abrupt."

In the end, the Defendant assaulted the victim in a way that said public official F, stating that the Defendant “I ambling, festing down,” and that “I ambling the ambling ambling in F’s entrance and cutting the ambling in the two direction.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties related to the collection of the office of the Seocho-gu Office and the keeping of the vehicle number plate of the public officials F in arrears.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as an application for business trip;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the defendant confessions and reflects the crime of this case, the degree of violence does not reach the injury to the defendant, the victim does not want the punishment against the defendant after receiving the apology from the defendant, the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime and has no record of punishment exceeding the fine) and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case are considered);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow