logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.07.07 2016고단2666
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: (a) the Defendant, along with D, E, and F, with G’s instructions, which are the Chinese total books of Skwikset Service Organization’s Chinese books; (b) held in possession of Skwikset Service article through the storage of goods within the city’s subway lines; (c) withdrawn the amount of damage from cash payment machine; and (d) the withdrawn cash, upon immediately remitting it to China, was recruited in order to take part in the Defendant’s act of receiving the withdrawn amount under the pretext of 7% of the withdrawn amount.

On March 26, 2015, it is possible to loan KRW 10 million on the face of money in terms of notarial expenses.

“Before making a false statement to the effect that, “,” the Defendant and F were transferred KRW 300,000 to one bank account (J) in the name of I on the same day from the victim, KRW 1.7 million to K’s post office account (L), KRW 2 million to M’s post office account (N) in the name of M on March 27, 2015, KRW 2.8 million to O’s corporate bank account (P), and the Defendant and F deposited money in cash and remitted it to China.

The defendant, in collusion with F and F and F influor, by deceiving the victim, received a total of 6,80,000 won by deceiving the victim.

2. As duly examined evidence, (i) around 10:48 on March 27, 2015, the victim deposited into the post office account in the name of M M around 10:5, 200,000 won deposited over two times in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Guro-gu, and 182-13 on December 13, 2015, in the view of digital ballast, into Korean bank located in the YY-gu in the building at the YY-gu, YY-si, Seoul Metropolitan City, but the defendant withdrawn the money from the station located in the new bank near 10:48 on the same day after the above time, and it is confirmed that the money was withdrawn at the 11:21 on November 21, 201, and (ii) the evidence submitted by the prosecutor submitted by the prosecutor that deposited the money with the account as stated in the facts charged or that it was the account used in the crime.

arrow