logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2016.08.23 2016고단217
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud;

A. A. On July 14, 2015, the Defendant entered into a contract for the waterproof Construction of the GF and the AF rooftop Building R with the victim C, the representative of “F” in the E “E” located in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group D.

When sending the amount of waterproof, the value of the article will be given from the agricultural cooperative as the construction is completed.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the cost of the material to the victim, because even if he received the construction cost from GFF due to excessive debt at the time, such as seizure, etc., it is difficult for GFF to fully use part of the construction cost.

Nevertheless, as above, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received from the victim, a delivery of goods equivalent to KRW 5,250,300 in total of the goods of KRW 82,50,000 in the market price of SH-11 30, market price of KRW 91,300, KRW 91,300, KRW 12, and KRW 275,000 in the market price, and KRW 5,250,300 in the market price.

B. On October 13, 2015, the Defendant against the victim H was engaged in collection and repair of the Franchisium No. 1333, 2015 at the office of the Franchisium office located in the Franchisium Pung-gun, Gangwon-do. The Defendant had no material value.

It is necessary to receive KRW 8 million from the house repair cost, and there remain a construction work equivalent to KRW 70,000 in the house repair cost to the Buddhist temple. Accordingly, the house repair cost will be paid up to October 27, 100 if the house repair cost is lent money.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, in fact, the Defendant did not have the construction cost to be paid at the time, and did not have the said construction work at the time. Therefore, even if the Defendant borrowed the money from the injured party, he did not have any intent or ability to repay it.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above and received 2,000,000 won from the place of the damage.

(c)

On January 27, 2016, the Defendant against the victim I was demoted on January 27, 201.

arrow