logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.16 2017가단5098223
양수금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 57,401,686 and any of them shall be the Plaintiff:

A. From February 26, 2002 to May 31, 2005, for KRW 46,187,260.

Reasons

1. The allegations and judgment of the parties

(a)as shown in the reasons for the attachment of the claim;

(However, the "creditor" is deemed to be the "defendant" for the plaintiff and the "debtor". 【The grounds for recognition】 Each entry and the purport of the whole pleadings in the evidence Nos. 1 to 5

B. As to this, the Defendant asserts that the extinctive prescription of each of the instant claims has expired.

However, the judgment on June 6, 2007, Seoul Central District Court Decision 2007Kadan23669, which was the judgment on the claim for reimbursement amount, became final and conclusive on June 19, 2007, and on June 19, 2007, the Seoul Southern District Court Decision 2007Gaso11864, respectively, is obvious to this court. The instant payment order was filed on April 12, 2017, which was before the lapse of 10 years thereafter, and thus, the Defendant’s assertion cannot be accepted.

2. According to the conclusion, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the money stated in the Disposition No. 1.

arrow