All appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation on this part is as stated in the part on the basis of “1. Basic Facts” of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition of the following, and therefore, it shall be accepted pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. The third and fourth instances of the judgment of the court of first instance shall add the following details to the deceased’s bereaved family members. The Defendant who paid the survivors’ pension and compensation for death on the ground of the deceased’s death shall be deemed to have died on October 11, 2017 through the 7th Military Pension Benefits Council, which is after the judgment of the court of first instance was rendered on the deceased’s death, and the death of the deceased was determined to be paid to the deceased’s bereaved family members under Article 31(1) of the former Military Pension Act (wholly amended by Act No. 16760, Dec. 10, 201; hereinafter “former Military Pension Act”). Accordingly, the mother of the deceased, who was selected as the deceased’s bereaved family members under Article 2518(15).

2. Although the result of the personality examination of the deceased, the executives and commander of the Defendant’s assertion by the parties did not conduct a formal interview only and did not report it to the upper department properly, the Plaintiffs’ executives and commander did not conduct the training by the counselor specialized in military life after the dispatch of the worker.