The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. According to the records, the court below determined punishment by taking into account various factors for sentencing, such as the poor quality of the crime in light of the course and method of the crime, the failure to recover damage, the history of punishment for the same kind of crime, and the fact that the same crime was committed when the repeated crime is committed, the mistake is divided and reflected during the repeated crime period, and the punishment was determined by taking into account the range of recommended sentences according to the sentencing guidelines established by the Supreme Court sentencing committee.

B. Although there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared with the original judgment because a new sentencing data has not been submitted in the trial at the original court, and considering various reasons for sentencing revealed in the oral proceedings, the lower court’s sentencing was too excessive and exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion.

It does not appear.

(c)

Therefore, the argument of sentencing is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.