Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On August 8, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Chemicals Control Act (snorting hallucinogenic substances) at the District Court on September 19, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 16, 2016. On December 16, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the same crime in the same court and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 14, 2017.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a sealed truck B.

On March 29, 2016, the Defendant driven a sealed truck at around 09:35 on March 29, 2016, and proceeded at a speed of about 60km from the parallel parallel to the parallel parallel in the parallel of parallel in the parallel of parallel in the parallel of parallel in the parallel of parallel in each speed of about 30km.

At this point, there is a center line of yellow solid lines, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle and prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the vehicle.

However, the Defendant neglected this and continued to proceed along, while driving along the two parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel between the center line and the parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel with the victim D (T. 63 years old)'s seat part of the Eststyna taxi driver's seat of the victim D (T. 63 years old) was enclosed with the front part of the cargo vehicle, continued to proceed, and continued to proceed with the driving of the victim F (W 28 years old)'s Ghyke, and was in the front part of the cargo vehicle.

Defendant 1 suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim D, such as satis, tensions, etc. in light of the following conditions: (a) the victim H (at the age of 20) who is a taxi passenger; (b) the injury to the brain satis, etc. without any satise in the two-day open medical treatment for about two weeks; and (c) the injury to the victim F, such as the satum satum satum of the satis, etc., which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of D and F;

1. A survey report on actual condition, on-site map and photograph;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Offenses and.