The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that even if the Defendant entered into a sales contract of 790.5 square meters of 1,400 square meters of 1,400 square meters of 1,400 square meters of forest land in Incheon Sipo-gun, Incheon, the Defendant, with knowledge of the fact that it is difficult to complete the registration of transfer of ownership to the victim normally, he/she did not deceive the victim, thereby deceiving the

It is also difficult to recognize the intention of defraudation to the defendant.

However, the lower court rendered a judgment of conviction against the Defendant by misunderstanding the facts.

2. The summary of the facts charged in this case is a person who works as a management director from Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government planning company E (hereinafter “E”) with the planning company on the sixth floor.

On March 2008, the Defendant was planned to enter bus terminals, Korean power construction works, and apartment houses around the 1400 square meters of land (hereinafter “the instant forest”) to the victim via E’s staff H in the victim G located in Nowon-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter “the instant forest”)’s house in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, through the victim G, which is located in the Defendant’s house, and the Defendant is expected to bring about a large amount of penthion around the Youngdo.

Since there are many prices of the forest land of this case between Cho Man, half of the forest land of this case shall be purchased. If the price is paid in full, registration of transfer of ownership shall be made without mold.

The victim, who had found E office around May 25, 2008, made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant himself/herself made a false statement, and entered into a sales contract with the victim to sell more than half of the forest land of this case at KRW 11,4720,000 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

However, in fact, E was merely delegated by the owner of the instant forest and its neighboring forest (J, K, L, M, N, andO) from the owner of the instant forest and land, and was not the owner of the instant forest and land.

In addition, on January 16, 2008, the remaining half of the forest land of this case sold to P and received the payment from P.