1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is an oriental medical doctor operating a Korean traditional Korean medicine doctor with the trade name called "Daehan-si in Gyeonggi-do," and the Plaintiff is a patient who has received medical treatment for the purpose of raising a shoulder and pain treatment at the Hanwon operated by the Defendant from February 13, 2015 to September 3, 2015.

The plaintiff was concurrently engaged in the therapy and rehabilitation treatment at the hospital at the D D Medical Center.

B. Around 16:00 on September 3, 2015, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant a part of crypt surgery, and then visited a member of the DNA on the same day (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”) and received a part of crypt treatment.

C. Nevertheless, when the symptoms with chest pain and respiratory difficulties continue to exist, the Plaintiff visited the film department of Fa Hospital on September 4, 2015, the following day, and was expressed that the Plaintiff appears to have scarcityed on the right side.

The Plaintiff immediately went to the emergency room of the National Health Insurance Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Masan Hospital”), was hospitalized with a chest scarcity on the same day, and was discharged on September 7, 2015.

In September 8, 2015 and September 10, 2015, the Plaintiff visited an emergency room due to a difficulty in respiratory pain.

E. On September 15, 2015, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the doctor of the Japanese Hospital from September 15, 2015, that “the patient was diagnosed as having been satisfying on September 4, 2015 as having been satisfyed on the right-hand part of the satisfy that was incurred after the satisfying procedure on the satisfy wall on September 3, 2015. No complete exclusion of the personality with a small amount of satch that was taken place after the satisfy.” However, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as having been hospitalized from September 4, 2015 to September 7, 2015 as being hospitalized with a high concentration of satisfying treatment without a satisfying opinion.” However, the Plaintiff continued to have been satisfy treatment by no later than December 2015.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence Nos. 4, 5, 9, 47, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. Prior to the occurrence of liability for damages, the same is recognized.