Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000,000 and by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

The defendants did not have to be in harmony with the residents of the same village with the issue of land litigation.

Defendant

B At around 18:30 on September 11, 2018, the Defendant: (a) sent the text message “fabining” on the front side of the Jinnam-gun, by using a mobile phone of the victim A (56 years of age); (b) had been in dispute with the victim’s mobile phone before the victim A (the victim A). On the other hand, the Defendant got about four times the victim’s skes due to the Plaintiff’s drinking; (c) made several times the victim’s skes and side skes; and (d) caused the victim’s damage to the skes and skes that need to be treated for about 21 days.

Defendant

A The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), carried the victim B(the age of 62) with her hand in opposition against the assault of the victim B(the age of 62), and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as an entrance, an open room for oral administration, etc., by drinking once the victim’s face.

Summary of Evidence

Defendant B

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. The police statement of the defendant A;

1. A medical certificate of injury (Evidence Nos. 9);

1. The investigation report (the photograph of the accused, such as the damaged part, etc.);

1. Some statements in the police interrogation protocol against Defendant A

1. Partial statement of the witness B;

1. Investigation reports (related to the measures taken by police officers entering the scene) some of statements and equipment, and investigation reports (to hear statements from police officers entering the scene);

1. Injury diagnosis statement (Evidence Nos. 7), investigation report (Attachment to external vehicles, etc.), emergency medical services log (B);

1. Defendant A’s assertion as to the Defendant A’s assertion of investigation report (such as the damaged part, etc.) asserts that Defendant A was unilaterally abused from B at the time of the instant case, and that Defendant A did not have any content of b’s flapsing or faceing.

Judgment

Witness

B stated that he was assaulted by the Defendant during the process of wrapping with the Defendant in the investigative agency and the court.

From the viewpoint of B, the defendant has a hostile relationship.