logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.02.21 2010가합64100
손해배상 등
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

(a) Defendant Daewoo Construction Co., Ltd., and member trading companies, respectively, shall be KRW 1,457,594,906 and the same.

Reasons

A. In light of the above, in light of the fact that design changes, such as substitution of construction items, increase and decrease construction, etc., occur frequently following the agreement between the parties concerned, construction differently from the project approval drawing, it is difficult to deem that there is a defect unless there is any circumstance that causes functional, aesthetic, and safety problems. In the instant case, there is no evidence to acknowledge the above circumstances (the amount indicated below is only that the appraiser calculated the difference in the construction cost, etc. in the construction cost on the basis of the project approval drawing). The Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit.

2. Change of 13,22,024 design 7,768, 164 design 2,50, 97, 94, 97, 97, 94, 164, 97, 964, 97, 964, 97, 966, 96, 964, 966, 966, 964, 966, 966, 964, 966, 966, 964, 966, 966, 964, 966, 966, 94, 966, 96, 96, 146, 96, 196, 196, 364, 196, 196, 196, 204, 196, 206, 306, 3664, 2664, 3664, etc.

arrow