The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

An application for remedy by an applicant for compensation shall be filed respectively.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case

A. At the time of prosecution, the Defendant is the Secretary General of G Co., Ltd., the purpose of which is to carry out solar projects in order to use a provisional order, and is the said corporation, H limited liability company, I Co., Ltd. (J Co., Ltd.), K limited liability company (L limited company’s trade name before the change), and M Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “the first charges”).

On October 21, 2008, the Defendant: “Around October 21, 2008, the Victim P is an environmental expert who has worked in Qlebling, RJ and SJ as professor for at least 20 years. There is an agreement with the company with solar technology, and T is to receive support of KRW 60 billion, but there is a need to purchase the project site. If the Defendant made an investment of KRW 30 million per power generation capacity, it is necessary to purchase the project site. From January 2009 to June 2009, the Defendant installed solar power generation facilities to reduce the profits coming from solar business, and the investor will reduce the ownership transfer registration in the investor’s name as of the size of 600 square meters per investment amount of KRW 30 million for the project site.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a final academic background as a university professor due to high school graduation, and did not have any property, and there was a debt of about KRW 400 million due to the failure of the business and debt of KRW 400 million to the bond company, even if he received money from the victim, he should use it in performing his own debt, so there was no intention or ability to promote solar projects or solar energy projects, and there was no intention or ability to register the transfer of ownership to the victim of the project site.

The Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 60 million from the victim to the U.S. Agricultural Cooperative Account on the same day under the pretext of investment in solar energy projects.

The defendant comes from this.