logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.08.21 2014가합208503
공사대금
Text

1. The Defendant: 2,58,390,463 won to Switzerland Construction Co., Ltd.; and 787,197,197.

Reasons

1. Basic fact contract amount: 126,765,590,000 won contract bond of 50,706,236,000 won: The rate of liquidated damages in the Gyeongcheon Innovation City: 0.1/100: the date of commencement of the construction period on June 22, 2011: 90 days for total construction, total labor costs: 39,80,94,991 won;

A. On June 20, 201, Plaintiff Spanco Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Spanco Construction”), Hanhwa Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff Spanco Construction”), and Dong Asia Construction Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff dong Construction”) concluded a contract for construction with the Defendant on June 20, 201 with regard to the construction of the Defendant’s headquarters’s new house construction (hereinafter “instant construction contract”) (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

Since 2011, the instant corporation entered into a contract with the Plaintiffs and the Defendant each year, and the Defendant entered into a completion inspection on each number of vehicles construction works.

B. The instant contract document (Evidence A No. 2) is accompanied by an integrity contract special condition, defect liability period (general condition), special condition for a construction contract (1), special condition for a construction contract (2), special condition for a construction contract (2), special condition for a construction contract, prior notice of tender, general condition for a construction contract, tender bond, public notice of construction contract, joint supply and demand agreement, design document, etc., and the purport that the content of each of the said documents is part of the instant contract is specified.

The contents related to this case among the general conditions of the construction contract shall be as shown in the attached Form.

C. On July 15, 2011, the Plaintiffs entered into a standard agreement on joint supply and demand for the instant construction project. The share ratio is 65% of the construction of the Plaintiff Spoco, 20% of the construction of the Plaintiff Kpoco, and 15% of the construction of the Plaintiff Spoco.

In relation to the instant contract, a contract was concluded for the modification of the total construction cost and construction period between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant four times, and the instant contract was concluded in accordance with the said modification contract.

arrow