Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 20:00 on May 4, 2020, Defendant A: (a) while talking with the victim B (the 36-year old age), and his male-friendly Gu from the building C, the Defendant: (b) turned the victim’s head head as his hand; (c) was sicking the victim’s head as his hand; and (d) was sicking the victim’s head.

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things and inflicted injury on the victim, such as “this part of the Madern tymopty, dump, and dump loss,” which requires treatment for about 42 days.

2. Defendant B, while working as the victim A (at the age of 38) at the same time and place as the victim A (at the age of 38), sent the victim’s face to drinking, as set forth in paragraph (1), sent the victim’s face to the head from the victim to the main disease, and sent the victim’s two arms to the shoulderer disease, which is a dangerous object, as set forth in paragraph (1).

As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous things with the victim for about 42 days, and caused the victim to “malopsis damage on the left side” in need of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (Submission of an injury diagnosis report);

1. Defendants of relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants on probation: The Defendants need to be punished strictly in terms of not only the risk of the instant penal code, but also the importance of the outcome of the instant penal code, which has used the cause of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code.

However, the defendants recognized the crime of this case and reflected the mistake, and the defendants did not want punishment against the other party by mutual agreement, and the defendants were in danger of being aware of the other party, and it appears that they had committed the crime of drinking alcohol and contingently, and in the case of the defendant A, a relatively minor fine is not allowed.