logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.10.14 2018나88814
손해배상(기)
Text

The judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiff's claim extended by this court, is modified as follows. A.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On January 22, 2017, at around 02:30, the Plaintiff: (a) taken a skiing from the skiing ground located in Gwangju City, according to the Eslves (hereinafter “instant slves”); (b) the Defendant was driving the slves following the instant slves at the same time and at the same place.

B. While the Defendant, who was at the bottom of the slot line than the Plaintiff, was also at the lower bottom of the running direction, was also proceeding by the right-way, and the Defendant was also at the lower bottom of the slot line, and the collision between the Plaintiff and the Defendant came to overlap with each other.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

As a result of the instant accident, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as satisfeing to the left-hand satisfe, which requires treatment for about two months.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 10 through 15, Eul 2, 3, 6, and 8 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply)'s statements or images, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence presented above and the purport of the entire pleadings, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting the duty of care to prevent any conflict with the Plaintiff, by controlling the progress rate of the Defendant’s moving along the instant scam from getting on and off the instant scam, and thereby resulting in the Plaintiff’s injury. Therefore, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the said tort.

① At the time of the instant accident, it was difficult for the Defendant at the bottom of the instant slot line to spons the lower part of the lower part of the Plaintiff. However, it was proceeding by means of the Defendant’s rounding bypassing the lower part of the phone, and as such, the Defendant was even look toward the upper part of the lower part of the slot line.

arrow