The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

For the reasons indicated in its holding, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the charges.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and evidence duly admitted, the lower court did not err in its judgment by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the concept of specific facts charged, “hospitalization”, the establishment of crime of fraud and fraud, the grounds for exclusion from liability, the recognition of the amount of fraud and fraud, the admissibility of evidence, etc., and did not err by omitting necessary judgment or by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations,

In addition, even in light of the record, the lower court did not err by infringing the Defendant’s right of defense in the trial proceedings.

The Supreme Court precedents cited by the defendant as the grounds for appeal are different from this case and thus inappropriate to be invoked.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.