beta
Text
1. The defendant's notary public's office Co-office in 2012, No. 9235, No. 9235 against the plaintiff, is authentic.
Reasons
1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in full view of the entries in Gap evidence 1, 3 through 6 (including paper numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Eul evidence 1 and 2 and the whole purport of the pleadings:
The Plaintiff is a person registered as an internal director of D Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “D”) on December 10, 2010.
B. On August 28, 2012, E, an employee of D, recognized that the Defendant had the obligation of KRW 500 million to the Defendant as a notary public C Office No. 9235, a document of quasi-loan agreement with the effect that D, together with the Defendant, had the obligation of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,000
(hereinafter referred to as “instant authentic deed”). C.
At the time of the preparation of the Notarial Deed, E had the Plaintiff’s certificate of personal seal impression and seal imprint, and using the above certificate of personal seal imprint, “the Plaintiff delegate the authority to prepare the Notarial Deed to E” prepared a letter of delegation in the Plaintiff’s name and submitted it to C by notary public.
On November 27, 2012 and January 25, 2013, the Plaintiff filed a criminal complaint against F, E, and G on the ground that the instant notarial deed was prepared by the Plaintiff as a joint and several surety without the Plaintiff’s permission, and as to this, “G” was necessary to change the director of D, her husband F, in a notary office located in Seo-gu Daejeon Metropolitan City, Seo-gu, Daejeon, to a notary public office located in H, and it is necessary to change the director of D’s her husband F, and deliver the Plaintiff’s her notarial certificate and a certificate of personal seal to E, and submit it through E after forging the power of attorney in the name of the Plaintiff, and let the employee of notarial affairs office submit it to the obligor F’s 50 million won debt against the Defendant of F, a quasi notarial deed of loan for consumption with the maximum amount of the guaranteed debt of 550 million won as a joint and several surety.