beta
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
Reasons
1. Determination on the part of the claim for credit card payments against the KBN Card Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “National Card”).
A. The Defendant, on March 18, 2009, subscribed as a credit card member on the national card and was used with a credit card around that time, did not pay for the use.
o on June 21, 2013, the National Card transferred the credit card payment claim against the Defendant to the Plaintiff. On June 21, 2013, the Plaintiff, who was delegated with the authority to notify the assignment of claims by the National Card, notified the Defendant of the assignment of claims on June 26, 20
o As above, credit card purchase-price claims remain the principal, interest and delay damages as shown in the attached Table as of September 25, 2016, and the overdue interest rate is 17% per annum.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 4-1, 5-2, and the purport of the whole pleadings
B. According to the above facts, the Defendant is obligated to pay the principal and interest of credit card payments and delay damages for the principal to the Plaintiff who acquired the credit card payment claim from the national card as above.
2. The judgment on each claim for small credit loans by a lot Capital Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “shot Capital”) and a mountain fruit loan Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “shot machine”)
A. The gist of the party's assertion (1) The plaintiff asserts that the defendant is obligated to repay the loan to the plaintiff who acquired the loan since the defendant obtained the loan from the lot Capital and mountain machine.
(2) As to this, the Defendant: (a) forged the application form for loan of sloping loan and the application form for loan of sloping loan under the name of the Defendant under the name of the Defendant; and (b) alleged that the Defendant did not have received a loan from sloping and sloping; and (c) as alleged by the Defendant, the Plaintiff directly knows that the Defendant’s signature on the application form for loan of sloping loan and the application form for loan of sloping loan differ from the Defendant’s writing.