Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for six months, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,00,000.
Defendant
B The above fine.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. No person who is a defendant shall register a real right to real estate in the name of a trustee under the title trust agreement;
Nevertheless, on August 27, 2014, the Defendant entered into a trust agreement with B on the part of the Defendant, stating that “B has the above loan name for three months only,” which is the Defendant’s ownership, at H real estate office located in Dongbcheon-si, Dongbcheon-si, Dongbcheon-si.” On August 27, 2014, the Defendant entered into a trust agreement with B on the part of “B to pay the interest on collateral loan.” On August 27, 2014, the Do Government District Court, Dongbcheon-cheon registry, which entered into the ownership transfer in the name of B as to the said I loan No. 202.
Accordingly, the Defendant transferred the ownership under B’s name, a trustee, according to the nominal trust agreement.
2. Defendant B, at the same time, at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph 1, accepted the consignment from Defendant B with respect to the said I Loan No. 202, and entered into a trust agreement with A in the name of the trust. On August 27, 2014, the Do Government District Court, Dongbcheon registry, Dongbcheon, entered into a trust agreement with Defendant on the said I Loan No. 202 under the name of the Defendant.
Accordingly, the Defendant transferred ownership to the name of the Defendant, a trustee, according to the name trust agreement.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant B’s legal statement
1. Each legal statement of the witness J and B;
1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the prosecution;
1. Statement made by each prosecutor in relation to J and B;
1. A copy of each real estate lease agreement, and a certificate fully registered;
1. Two copies of a real estate transaction contract and receipt;
1. The defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that the real estate of this case was actually sold to the defendant B and that there was no nominal trust.
However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the court’s duly admitted evidence, Defendant A and his defense counsel are recognized as having entrusted the instant real estate to Defendant B, and thus, Defendant A and his defense counsel.