beta
Text
A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of No. 2 and No. 3 with prison labor for a crime of No. 1 in the judgment of the defendant, for a period of four months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant,
1. On February 12, 2009, the Gwangju District Court sentenced 4 months of suspended sentence to 4 months of imprisonment for fraud at the Gwangju District Court on February 20, 2009, which became final and conclusive on February 20, 2009. On January 10, 2008, in collusion with C, the Gwangju Mine District D office around January 10, 2008: (a) the supply value of D as a supplier of D without supplying goods or services in the name of D to Limited Liability Company E was issued a tax invoice of KRW 19,060,00, and from that time until April 15, 2008, the total supply value of D as a supplier without supplying goods or services was delivered to each customer (a tax invoice of KRW 562,321,300, a total tax invoice of total tax invoice of KRW 14,562,321,300;
2. Around June 16, 2009, the facts were issued or received a false tax invoice of KRW 148,954,660,000 in total 14 times from that time until December 5, 2009, including the issuance of a tax invoice of KRW 148,954,000 for supply value to “G” as a supplier without supplying goods or services to “F” (2010 large 3402);
3. On January 25, 2010, at H office in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on February 2009 (from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009), the sales and total tax invoices on KRW 671,986,10,00 issued to "G" under the J's operation located in Kujin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on July 1, 2009, as if the goods were supplied to "G" in the amount equivalent to KRW 671,986,100 were falsely entered and submitted to the North Jeju Special Metropolitan City Tax Office on the basis of the false sales tax invoice seven, and on the same day, the sales and total tax invoices on KRW 2,46,686,280 were entered falsely and submitted to the North Special Metropolitan City Tax Office on three occasions as shown in attached Table 3.
(2011 order 116) Summary of evidence / [209 order 3291]
1. Entry of the defendant in part of the protocol of the 12th trial (the part that the defendant issued the tax invoice in collusion with C in the manner of issuing the tax invoice in attached Table 1);
1. 3 times;