logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2015.06.25 2014가단44353
물품대금
Text

1. Defendant A Co., Ltd. and Defendant B jointly and severally with the Plaintiff KRW 65,00,000,000 and the aforementioned amount from July 21, 2013 to July 2014.

Reasons

1. According to the statements in Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 13, 14, and 3-2, Gap evidence Nos. 6 through 10, and 1, and 2 as to the claim against defendant A corporation and defendant B, the plaintiff supplied livestock products to defendant A corporation (hereinafter "the defendant corporation") from Oct. 2006 to Oct. 20, 2013, the non-paid goods amounting to 65,00,000 won around July 20, 2013; the defendant Eul prepared and delivered a letter to the plaintiff on Jul. 30, 2013 that he/she would pay the above 65,00,000 won to the plaintiff; the delivery of each of the above statements is the only internal director of the defendant corporation at the time of the preparation of each of the above statements; thus, since the delivery of each of the above statements is the meaning of the defendant corporation's goods price guaranteed by the defendant corporation Eul, the defendant corporation and the defendant corporation are jointly and severally liable to pay damages for delay.

2. As to the claim against Defendant D, the Plaintiff consented to the payment of the goods at the time of the preparation of the above letter, Defendant D was registered as a director with Defendant B as the actual operator of the Defendant Company, and Defendant D had been supplied with livestock products from the Plaintiff after completing the business registration as “E” after completing the instant letter. Thus, Defendant D is jointly and severally liable with the above Defendants to pay the said goods.

먼저 피고 D가 그 지급의무를 승낙하였는지를 살피건대, 피고 D가 그 지급을 승낙하였다는 점에 부합하는 듯한 갑 제11호증의 기재는 믿을 수 없고, 갑 제1호증의 기재에 의하면 위 각서에 “30,000,000원 D실장이 1年 內에 完拂”이라고 기재되어 있는 사실은 인정되나, 이를 기재한 것이 피고 D가 아닌 피고 B이라는 점은 원고도 스스로 인정하는 바이므로, 그러한 기재가 있다는 사정만으로는 피고 D가 그 지급의무를 승낙하였다고 인정하기 부족하고 달리 이를 인정할 증거가 없다.

The following is the plaintiff.

arrow