1. The Defendant’s KRW 117,895,670 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from November 23, 2013 to May 4, 2016.

On April 2, 2013, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendant for the construction of the Defendant’s factory (hereinafter “instant construction”) under the terms and conditions as follows (hereinafter “instant construction contract”).

Evidence No. 1 and No. 1 of the Act on the Construction Period: From April 10, 2013

7. Until October: Liability for warranty of KRW 577,00,000 (excluding value-added tax): One year from the date of completion: 1/100; at the same time, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a family agreement with respect to the instant construction contract, which stipulates the construction cost as KRW 789,00,000 (excluding value-added tax) (hereinafter “the instant side agreement”); and the Plaintiff agreed to return money paid in excess of the actual construction cost to the Defendant.

The Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 640,00,000,000 in total, as of June 21, 2013, KRW 270,000 on June 25, 2013, KRW 160,000 on September 16, 2013, KRW 50,000 on September 17, 2013, KRW 60,000 on September 17, 2013, KRW 60,000 on October 31, 2013, KRW 60,000 on October 31, 2013, and KRW 50,00 on December 27, 2013.

The Plaintiff issued a tax invoice of KRW 20,00,000 with respect to the instant construction contract (i.e., the value of KRW 200,000,000) on April 2, 2013 (i.e., the value of KRW 200,000,000), and KRW 267,30,000 on June 25, 2013 (i.e., the value of KRW 243,00,000,000), and KRW 24,30,60,000 on November 20, 2013 (i.e., the value of KRW 346,00,000) (i. the value of KRW 344,60,000).

The evidence Nos. 5 and 17-1, 2, and 3 of the Evidence Nos. 17. The plaintiff and the defendant deleted the electrical construction part of the instant construction from March 3, 2014, and put them up for the construction cost under the side agreement of the instant case.

From KRW 789,00,000, to KRW 722,146,662 of the entry into an amendment agreement (hereinafter “instant amendment agreement”)

A. The defendant's factory was approved on November 22, 2013. The defendant's factory was approved on November 22, 2013

A. 3 Evidence No. 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 17 evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings and arguments of Gap's evidence No. 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 10, 17.