logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.08.23 2016가단5133679
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,229,80 for the Plaintiff and the following: 5% per annum from March 23, 2016 to August 23, 2017.

Reasons

Basic Facts

Around June 2014, the Plaintiff, a company running the insurance business, concluded a worker's accident security liability insurance contract (hereinafter referred to as the "insurance contract of this case") with the cover industry as the insured, and with the cover period as from June 20, 2014 to June 20, 2015, with the cover period as the cover industry, and with the cover period as from June 20, 2014 to June 20, 2015, where its employees suffer from a disaster during the construction works performed at a nationwide level, the cover amount is KRW 200 million per person liable for the liability of the cover industry as the employer, and KRW 300 million per accident.

On November 18, 2014, at around 10:05, at the site of “the Do Forest high-proof earthquake-proof reinforcement and reinforcement construction works” located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, for which a victim A (Nam and 50 years of age) officially recognized non-publicized victim A (hereinafter referred to as “the accident in this case”), who works for the Do Forest high-priced underground road at the length of 6 meters during the non-scam dismantling work, shicks the pipe at the B urban bus of the Defendant company where the Defendant company driven the primary line, and caused the damage to the said victim, such as the 2nd stop-down steel, etc. (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 8, Eul evidence 1, video of Eul evidence 1, the purport of whole pleadings.

The victim of the joint tort liability as to the cause of the claim is an employee belonging to the Liber industry, and there was an accident that the pipe gets off the non-speak pipe outside of the Working Group and the near the road was faced with. Since the victim's Lline industry is adjacent to the road, the victim's workplace is adjacent to the road, so that tensions such as pipe are not protruding on the road, safety education is provided in advance to workers and necessary facilities such as blocking, etc. are provided.

arrow