(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2019.03.19 2019고단169

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 여주지원 2019.03.19 2019고단169

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

. The road in front of the D cafeteria was driven at a speed of about 60 km by the speed of f0 km from the front of the police box to the front of the police box.

At this point, there is a center line of yellow solid lines as the hub section of one lane, so the person engaged in the vehicle driving duty has a duty of care to thoroughly drive the front line while under the influence of alcohol and to safely drive the car line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and led the victim E (2*) who was driving in the opposite lane due to negligence over the center line of the yellow-line and driven by the victim E (2*) who was driving in the opposite lane due to the foregoing negligence, was shocked into the top left part of the car driven by the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, by such occupational negligence, the injury to the victim E in the absence of about 3 weeks in an open room for treatment, such as brain-dead sugar, etc., the injury of the victim G (3*) who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, the injury of the 1st head of the cage cage cage, the removal of the cage cage cage, and the injury of the victim H (4*) who is the passenger of the damaged vehicle, to approximately 2 weeks in the face requiring treatment.

2. Around 07:55 on January 19, 2019, the Defendant driven a B SP car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.082% at the 3km section from the Do in front of the Gyeonggi Pyeong-gun to the roads front of the D cafeteria located in the same military C.

As a result, the defendant was a person who violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, and was driving in violation of the above provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reports (1), (2) on traffic accidents;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Investigation report (verification of the same kind of power) and summary order;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as criminal records;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning criminal facts;

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법 제3조 제1항

-도로교통법

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2019.03.19 2019고단169

-서울서부지방법원 2018.05.03 2018고단254

-서울북부지방법원 2018.08.23 2018고단1932

-대전지방법원 논산지원 2018.10.30 2018고단203

-광주지방법원 2017.02.16 2016고단3515