The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to the part concerning the obstruction of performance of official duties among the facts charged of mistake of facts, the Defendant was faced with police officers who were on the side by one of the perpetrator, and did not commit any act described in the facts charged with the intention of obstruction of official duties.

Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty on the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (2 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination:

A. Of the facts charged as to the assertion of mistake of facts, there is a statement by the court of the court below as evidence directly corresponding to the obstruction of performance of official duties.

J은 원심 법정에서 “싸움이 났다는 112 신고를 받고 현장에 출동하였더니 피고인이 상대편이라고 생각되는 사람에게 계속 달려들어 싸우려고 해 제지했다. 우선 진정을 시키고 사건 경위에 대하여 청취하려고 하였으나 듣지는 못했다. 피고인은 1층과 2층 계단 부분에 쭈그려 앉아 있었는데, 아직 상호 진술을 듣지 못한 상태라 피고인이 도주하지 못하도록 길목을 막고 서있었다. 그런데 피고인이 다른 이야기를 하거나 하는 것 없이 갑자기 일어나 팔꿈치로 입술 부분을 가격하면서 가려고 하였다.”라는 취지로 진술하였던바, 이는 그 내용이 구체적이고, 원심 증인 F의 진술 내지 사진(증거기록 12면)의 영상과 모순되지 않을 뿐 아니라, 거짓으로 진술할 만한 특별한 동기도 보이지 않아 신빙성이 있다.

According to this, in order to prevent the defendant from performing official duties in relation to the investigation of assault or bodily injury by J police officers, the fact that the above police officer was detained is sufficiently recognized as stated in the facts charged.

On the other hand, the defendant did not publish that "the defendant caused the police officer to be flicker (referring to the other party to the fighting such as F)."