Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. On January 21, 2017, at around 23:00, the Defendant: (a) around 108-dong 606 (the Defendant’s wife’s wife’s wife’s 108-dong 606 (the Defendant’s wife’s 108-dong 606); (b) the Defendant’s wife’s wife’s her wife’s her wife’s her wife (here, 37-year 37) introduced the Defendant’s her wife to visit the Defendant’s her wife; and (c) was waiting before the above 108-dong 106 in order to drive away from her wife’s her wife’s her wife’s her wife’s her wife’s her wife; and (d) reported the Defendant’s her her wife’s her wife’s her wife’s her husband’s her wife’s her husband’s her wife’s her wife’s her husband.
2. The facts charged in this case are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim's express intent under Article 260 (3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement bound in the trial records, it is recognized that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.