The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant received hospital treatment only because of the need for hospital treatment due to the brutity of the reasons for appeal, and even though there was no false hospitalization to receive insurance money, the lower court convicted all of the charges of this case. The lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion of the judgment

2. In full view of the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the first instance court, the following circumstances, i.e., the Defendant took care of the developments during which the Defendant was hospitalized.

The court below stated that the defendant was hospitalized at the time of three times of hospitalization, and that there was no special error in the result of the radiation examination on the victim's chest and urine, etc., and that the defendant did not receive special treatment except physical treatment during the period of hospitalization, and that there was no need to record the defendant's appearance and deception, and that there was no need to record the fact that the defendant was hospitalized at the time of three times of hospitalization, and that there was no need to record the fact that the defendant was hospitalized at the time of three times of hospitalization. In full view of the above, the court below stated that the defendant was hospitalized at the time of three times of hospitalization, and that there was no special reason to view that there was no need to record the defendant's appearance and deception, and that there was no need to record the fact that the defendant was hospitalized at the time of three times of hospitalization (the investigative record No. 10 of the investigation record).