A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

around 04:23 on May 13, 2016, the Defendant requested a policeman D to return home from the police station C, a member of the Kimhae-si Police Station C of the Kimhae-si Police Station, who was called out after receiving a report of assault in front of the store at Kimhae-si, and demanded him to do so. The Defendant: (a) was aware of his her blaps and flaps; (b) while doing so, he saw the blaps; (c) while doing so, he saw the blaps and flaps of the blaps; and (d) was aware of the blaps.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (including the fact that the defendant is a primary offender, the fact that the defendant is a reflector, and the degree of violence is not serious);

1. The community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;