1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The Plaintiff filed a claim for the amount of the bill and the loan, and the court of first instance rejected the claim for the amount of the bill and dismissed the claim for the loan.

Since the defendant only appealed, the object of this court's adjudication is limited to the claim for the amount of the bill.

2. Basic facts

A. On October 4, 2010, the Defendant issued a promissory note of KRW 36.5 million at the face value of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant promissory note 1”) to the Plaintiff on October 4, 2010, the date of issuance, October 4, 2010, and the date of payment at sight, the place of payment, and the place of payment. On the same day, a notary public drafted a promissory note No. 1 (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”) with a law firm 2010 and 98.

B. On October 8, 2010, the Defendant issued a promissory note of KRW 6 million at the face value of Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “instant promissory note”) to the Plaintiff on October 8, 2010, the issue date of which is October 8, 2010, and the payment date is in sight, payment place, and payment place. On the same day, a notary public made and issued a notarial deed of promissory note of KRW 101 (hereinafter “notarial deed of this case”).

C. On November 15, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant confirmed that they were liable for KRW 42,780,000 to the Plaintiff (such as failure to supply goods, compensation for damages, etc.). ② The Plaintiff and the Defendant established a separate stock company in consultation with each other, deliver all documents, seals, etc. to each other, and perform all kinds of detailed matters, such as the establishment of a separate stock company, delivery of all documents, seals, etc., and when the establishment procedures are completed smoothly, the Plaintiff shall be treated as re-investment in the company that established the establishment, but the Plaintiff shall be deemed to have re-investment in the company that established the establishment of the establishment, and ③ a written agreed consent was prepared

(hereinafter “instant agreement”) D. D.

In other words, the plaintiff and the defendant on December 9, 201, and the plaintiff are Suwon District Court.